Search This Blog

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

The Eighth Principle

 Mathematically proficient students notice if calculations are repeated, and look both for general methods and for shortcuts. Upper elementary students might notice when dividing 25 by 11 that they are repeating the same calculations over and over again, and conclude they have a repeating decimal.  As they work to solve a problem, mathematically proficient students maintain oversight of the process, while attending to the details. They continually evaluate the reasonableness of their intermediate results. 

The central idea here is that mathematics is open to drawing general results (or at least good conjectures) from trying examples, looking for regularity, and describing the pattern both in what you have done and in the results. 


This principle relates so closely to the last where students are looking for patterns and structure to base their reasoning and explain their mathematical thinking. The investigative or inquiry approach to math leads students to discover patterns and structure in mathematical concepts. 

One example from Thinkmath is that "children can recognize that adding 9 can be simplified by treating it as adding 10 and subtracting 1and that this can be a discovery rather than a taught strategy. In one activity—there are obviously many other ways of doing this—children start, e.g., with 28 and respond as the teacher repeat only the words “ten more” (38), “ten more” (48), “ten more” (58), and so on. They may even be counting, initially, to verify that they are actually adding 10, but they soon hear the pattern in their responses (because no other explanatory or instruction words are interfering) and express that discovery from their repeated reasoning by saying the 68, 78, 88 almost without even the request for “ten more.” When, at some point, the teacher changes and asks for “9 more,” even young students often see it as “almost ten more” and make the correction spontaneously. Describing the discovery then becomes a case of “expressing regularity” that was found through “repeated reasoning.” Young students then find it very exciting to add 99 the same way, first by repeating the experience of getting used to a simple computation, adding 100, and then by coming up with their own adjustment to add 99." (Thinkmath)
"Through investigation and discovery, students can use repeated addition to begin their exploration of linear growth and repeated multiplication to extend to geometric growth. Drawing on their observations of geometric properties, students make and test conjectures, develop generalizations, and write formulas."  (Discovering Math) The more children can relate repeated patterns the more connections they will build and the more meaning they will bring to their math.

7 comments:

  1. This is perhaps my favorite principle in math compared to our English language... When you learn a rule in math it's consistent rather than learning a spelling rule and all the exceptions. Is my science and math prejudice coming through??? Having an awful memory myself I know I appreciated the consistency of math and science. This is one reason why I love bringing nonfiction into the ela piece.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just in case you were wondering, I had to fix two mistakes I made in the last post. Now I write my comments in pages/word and then copy them to post them. Works for me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is an important principle, I agree. This principle is based on the assumption that a mathematics classroom is assumed to be inquiry based. It is expected that the students are using inquiry to discover the rules on their own. Once they have discovered the rules, then we can introduce them to the rules and procedures presented in their math books and teach them our “tricks”.
    At the elementary level we tend not to allow the students the time they need for inquiry. We tend to teach procedures and rules first. This is done with good intentions. It does allow the majority of the students to perform a task and be successful. Teachers are taking a risk when doing this. Not all students will gain the in depth understanding of the concept. This lack of understanding will show up in the student’s inability to write about their understanding and the inability to perform the next level of skills related to a concept. The new MA Frameworks will hopefully allow for the time students need for inquiry.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I so agree and I love how you put it, Kim! Skipping the inquiry/investigative piece "seems to work" for a good majority of our students, but then as concepts get more involved and true understanding is needed to build on; we often find that our students' understanding is surface level, they can perform the algorithm, but stumble when it comes to explaining, expanding on or applying their knowledge to a new situation. Many of us were taught in exactly this manner which leads to another problem.... how do we get our teachers to understand these concepts the same way.... The only thing I can think of is to enmesh or involve them in an inquiry of their own, so they can discover the structure and patterns the same way! I have missed your voice! Glad you are joining the discussion!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. This reminds me of a conversation I had with a parent this past year. I had told the students that they were to use the strategy that worked best for them, assuming they were able to reach the correct answers consistently and explain their thinking. I then had a parent force their child to use the common algorithm, and when the student came in to school, he couldn't explain what he had done on his homework. Come to find out, the parent didn't understand how the student was solving the problems, so they didn't allow them to use their strategy. I didn't understand the strategy enough to use it myself, but the student was able to explain it to me so that I could see his thinking.

    Everyone's brains work a little differently, and we need to allow our students to think in the way that works best for them. For some, when taught the algorithm, everything will click into place. For others, they will find a strategy that works for them, and those other strategies can help the students that haven't found their way yet.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I love your last paragraph Kristin.... and that says everything, doesn't it?!

    ReplyDelete